Don’t have an account? Register now!
or register a Legends Decks account
Already have an account? Log in now!
7 Comments
Granted it’s in beta, but if they thought nerfing Mantikora was a step in the right direction then that tells you what they’re thinking. Aggro players complained all day about Mantikora yet it’s a 6/6 guard that can be targeted by anything and dies to lethal just like everything else. For 10 mana it was supposed to halt an offense but since aggro players whined they figured it would be best to force an aggro world in the game. The attitude is if you can’t beat em join em and it’s making people so happy…..which is a matter of opinion.
I think the game has great potential but if the intent is to cater to a crowd of aggro, miserly, BM cream filled players then it’s not going to get any better. Aggro has a place in any card game but it should not be the posterchild for the entire game.
There’s still plenty of decks here that wreck agro and plenty of great prophecy cards that smack SMOrc in the face.
At the end of the day aggro decks and especially Action Assassin had more play and win rate than most any other decks and archetype. That is not opinion that is fact. What also is fact is most those decks especially action assassin received no nerfs and will play just as it has been. Decks also with Soulrest Marshall will also be just fine because playing 12 mana worth of cards on turn 4 and 5 is also balanced I take it. Prophecy is not strong enough in consistency to say it will save you from face and Hexmage decks. If they nerf the right cards the true shift in meta will occur.
You can also downvote this as well but you can’t truly say I’m lying. This comes from a person who mains Priest in HS. I’m aware of the cancer there as well. However, I can better deal with braindead shaman aggro more than the current state of this game.
You bring up Soulrest Marshall, yet another card I don’t consider aggro. You can make the argument it still needs a further nerf, but you keep bringing up cards to make your argument that don’t make sense to me. Perhaps you and I have a different definition of the term “aggro”?
That wasn’t me who down-voted you, but the fact that someone did leads me to believe I’m not off base with my criticisms of your OP. And if you think HS>TESL, in any respect, that tells me all I need to know.
LEVEL.9
One of the reasons why I’ve been playing this more than HS was that I enjoyed the varied meta. Now, it seems people have realized they can play straight face decks to great effect on the ladder. If the meta continues to devolve into the fastest decks wins, I don’t see myself sticking with this game. It doesn’t help that these face decks are much cheaper to build than any sort of control deck. It makes sense that new players looking to rank up would go the cheap aggro route. It’s just not the type of game that I enjoy.
Have you guys also found the meta really speeding up the past couple days?